Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-08-28 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than Moto G9 Play's overall score of 76.7. Although the Galaxy S10e is older than the Moto G9 Play, it's construction is way lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a better looking display than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a lot greater screen density.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little bit better processing power than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Moto G9 Play has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.