Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-03-08 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than Moto Z Force, having an 86.3 score against 75.8. The Galaxy S10e construction is incredibly newer and just a bit lighter, but just a bit thicker than Moto Z Force. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto Z Force counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel number per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Samsung Galaxy S10e captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
The Moto Z Force counts with slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Galaxy S10e is way more expensive than Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.