Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-08 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a general score of 86.3 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy S10e is a newer phone than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it is a little bit heavier and way thicker. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels quantity in each inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10e features just a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity. Galaxy S10e has a little bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy S10e also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much larger camera aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S10e not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.