Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-08 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is better than Moto Z2 Play's global score of 77.4. Galaxy S10e's body is newer than Moto Z2 Play's, although it is extremely thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a just a little greater screen pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has slightly more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10e has a little faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10e features a bit longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3100mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a 12 MP back-facing camera and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has faster video frame rates and a bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save some money, you can get the Moto Z2 Play, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.