Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than the Moto Z3, with a score of 86.3 against 77.6. Although Samsung Galaxy S10e and the Moto Z3 were released with only 7 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S10e construction is a bit lighter but also thicker than the Moto Z3. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better display density and a bit higher 1080 x 2280 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit faster processor than Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10e has just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S10e also has a lot bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations, a larger sensor and higher video frame rate.
Moto Z3 features a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e costs more money than the Moto Z3, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.