Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than the Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e construction is thicker but a bit lighter than the Moto Z3 Play, and they were released only a couple months apart. Galaxy S10e has a little faster processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S10e has a bit more vivid display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a just a bit greater number of pixels per display inch. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a slightly bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10e has just a little better battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3100mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Galaxy S10e features just a bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same sensor size, the same video resolution and a same resolution camera, the Galaxy S10e also has higher 60 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
The Galaxy S10e not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.