Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a bit better than Motorola One Action, with a score of 86.3 against 78.5. The Galaxy S10e design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola One Action, even though both of them were released with only 5 months difference. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better display than Motorola One Action, although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, they both have a better amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola One Action has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10e has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10e takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy S10e also has faster video frame rates and a larger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Motorola One Action has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10e costs more money than the Motorola One Action, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.