Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10e is older than Motorola One Hyper, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. The Motorola One Hyper takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower video frame rates and a way tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Motorola One Hyper has just a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10e costs more than Motorola One Hyper, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.