Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is slightly better than the Motorola One Zoom, having a general score of 86.3 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body is thinner and much lighter than Motorola One Zoom, even when both were released only 6 months apart. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S10e has a bit better looking display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixels density. The Motorola One Zoom shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera with much more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a better storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola One Zoom features better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S10e is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.