Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 435 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 score. The Galaxy S10e has a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has much more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy S10e features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3100mAh. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a much better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.