Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is slightly better than Nokia XR20, with an 86.3 score against 80.8. Galaxy S10e's construction is notably thinner and much lighter than the Nokia XR20, although it was released many years before. Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better processing power than Nokia XR20. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Nokia XR20 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Nokia XR20's storage capacity for applications and games is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S10e one, both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage.
The Nokia XR20 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 49% larger battery size.
The Galaxy S10e is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.