Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Even though Galaxy S10e and nubia Red Magic 3S were released only a few months apart, Galaxy S10e is lighter and somewhat thinner. The Galaxy S10e features a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels per screen inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing images in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher resolution camera, a lot bigger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S10e is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.