Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10e is older than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's design is incredibly lighter and thinner. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Galaxy S10e and nubia Red Magic 5S both count with similar processors, and although the nubia Red Magic 5S has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Nubia Red Magic 5S takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way bigger sensor.
The Galaxy S10e has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 45% greater battery size.
Galaxy S10e not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.