Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X2, but it is somewhat lighter. OPPO Find X2 has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger display.
OPPO Find X2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S10e features a slightly better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
OPPO Find X2 has better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. The OPPO Find X2 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.