Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting a overall score of 86.3 against 77.7. Galaxy S10e's design is somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X2 Neo, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released about 15 months before. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite worse pixel number per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger display.
The Galaxy S10e features just a bit better performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.