Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, with an 86.3 score against 83.1. Galaxy S10e's design is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than OPPO Find X2 Pro, although it was released a little bit more than a year before. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a larger screen and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 37 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.