Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-04-14 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's general score of 76. Samsung Galaxy S10e's design has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it is somewhat lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit sharper display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a way better resolution back camera.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S10e is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.