Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | -- |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a score of 86.3 against 77. The Galaxy S10e design is a little bit thicker but lighter than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a slightly better display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy S10e counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photos or video in low light situations and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a very superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.