Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-08 | -- |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.29 ounces | -- |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than the Galaxy A34, having a score of 86.3 against 82.9. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A34, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10e features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a quite better pixels amount in each inch in the display.
Galaxy S10e features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A34, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor and a back camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better images in low light situations. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A34, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A34 has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.