Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is slightly better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting a score of 86.3 against 79.4. Although Galaxy S10e is noticeably older than Galaxy A35 5G, it's design is just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a really superior performance than Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e and the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G both feature incredibly similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot more MP camera and a much bigger camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.