Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy S10e, with a 91.3 score against 86.3. Galaxy A52 5G is a way newer cellphone than the Galaxy S10e, although it's a lot heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy S10e has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with slightly more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.