Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Samsung Galaxy S10e, with a 97.6 score against 86.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold and Samsung Galaxy S10e were released with only a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is thinner but also notably heavier than Samsung Galaxy S10e.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a quite greater pixel number per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold and Samsung Galaxy S10e feature quite similar cameras, both of them have the same resolution camera in the back, the same back camera sensor size, the same video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality. The Galaxy Fold has a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 41% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S10e. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S10e, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.