Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2022-07-01 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Deep Green, Light Blue and Orange Copper |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 4000 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M13's score of 81.1. The Galaxy S10e is an way older phone than Samsung Galaxy M13, but Samsung made it much lighter and a little bit thinner. The Galaxy M13 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S10e, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S10e and the Galaxy M13 count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy M13 has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2408 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S10e shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy M13, because although it has a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M13, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M13 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.