Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a bit better than Galaxy M20, having an 86.3 score against 78.9. Galaxy S10e is a thinner and lighter device than the Galaxy M20, although they were only released 1 months apart. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixel density.
Galaxy S10e features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy M20 has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. Samsung Galaxy S10e takes better videos and photos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.