Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-06-18 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is slightly better than Galaxy M40, getting an 86.3 score against 85. Galaxy S10e's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy M40, but it's lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M40. Both have 6 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S10e has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2280px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy M40 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, a tinier camera aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also counts with a camera with way more MP.
Galaxy M40's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Galaxy S10e one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M40 has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.