Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 435 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S10e's 86.3 general score. Galaxy M51 is a newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S10e, but it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy M51 and Galaxy S10e both feature quite similar storage capacity to install applications and games, both of them have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and equal 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S10e counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy M51. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 captures better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.