Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, getting an 86.3 score against 79.3. Galaxy S10e's design is way newer and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, but it is a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a sharper display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit greater display density.
Galaxy S10e has a greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10e shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments and a larger sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The Galaxy S10e has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10e has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S10e is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.