Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-03-08 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's global score of 80.4. Galaxy S10e is a lighter cellphone than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but both are equally thin. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a bit greater number of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S10e shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a same resolution camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10e also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy S10e is also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.