Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than Galaxy S10e, with a general score of 89 against 86.3. Galaxy Note10's design has the same thickness than Galaxy S10e, but it is heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a CPU that is just as good as Galaxy S10e's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2280 resolution, the Galaxy S10e also counts with a quite greater display pixel density. Galaxy Note10's camera is very similar to the Galaxy S10e one, they have the same back camera sensor size, the same 60 fps video frame rates, a same size aperture, a 12 megapixels camera and the same video resolution.
Galaxy S10e features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy Note10 features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S10e. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S10e, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.