Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2017-09-15 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note8, having an 86.3 score against 83. The Galaxy S10e body is newer, incredibly lighter and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note8. Samsung Galaxy Note8 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy S10e, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a quite bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note8. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note8, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10e captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same resolution back facing camera and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Note8 has just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10e not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Note8, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.