Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | -- |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than the Galaxy S24 FE, having an 86.3 score against 76. The Galaxy S10e construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy S24 FE, but it is a lot lighter. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a brighter display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Galaxy S10e features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S24 FE, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S10e has a very superior CPU than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10e captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy S10e is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.