Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | -- |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.29 ounces | -- |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S25's 82.6 score. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy S25 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little larger display.
Galaxy S10e has a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S25 features a very superior camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot higher resolution camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy S25 counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S10e is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.