Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-03-08 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a global score of 86.3 against 75.8. Galaxy S10e's construction is noticeably newer, lighter and much thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a more vivid screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a same resolution camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has higher video frame rate and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
Galaxy S10e counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S7 Active features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10e costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.