Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is better than the Galaxy XCover 5, with a global score of 86.3 against 78.1. Galaxy S10e's construction is lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover 5, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. The Galaxy S10e features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has more RAM.
Galaxy S10e has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a little bit bigger display, more pixels per display inch and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2280. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a superior camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S10e has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 3100mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.