Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 score. Samsung Galaxy S10e's body is much lighter and much thinner than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Galaxy S10e has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with slightly more memory for apps and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S10e features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S10e shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a much less MP resolution camera, it also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.