Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 408.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 435 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 86.3 score against 80.1. The Galaxy S10e body is incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released around 13 months before. Galaxy S10e has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same resolution camera, a F1.5 camera aperture and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy S10e has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S10e not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.