Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's overall score of 81. Samsung Galaxy S10e is an older phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but Samsung managed to build it way lighter and notably thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10e features a little sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy S10e has a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger aperture and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much better storage for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy XCover Pro features better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10e not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.