Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-07-30 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Premium's 82.2 global score. The Galaxy S10e is a a lot lighter and way thinner cellphone than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, although both of them were only released 7 months apart. The Xperia XZ2 Premium features an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a way higher pixels quantity per display inch and a lot higher 2160 x 3840px resolution.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium's CPU is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S10e's processor, both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Xperia XZ2 Premium features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos in low light situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a larger camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Galaxy S10e features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 3540mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S10e is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.