Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has an overall score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X2's general score of 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body is thinner and extremely lighter than Xiaomi Poco X2, even though it was released only 11 months before. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X2. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density. The Galaxy S10e counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images and video in low-light environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 45 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.