Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a score of 86.3 against 81.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10e is older than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, it's design is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter. Galaxy S10e features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit inferior pixel quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy S10e counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a superior battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and video in low-light situations and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way better 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.