Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 general score. Even though the Galaxy S10e is older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's body is incredibly lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10e has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels number per display inch. The Galaxy S10e counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10e is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.