Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 408.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's global score of 81.1. Even though Galaxy S10e is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, it's body is much lighter and thinner. Galaxy S10e has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 62% more battery size.
Galaxy S10e is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.