Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Google Pixel 3, with a 90.8 score against 80. Even though Galaxy S20 FE is newer than the Google Pixel 3, it is just a little thicker and way heavier. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels quantity per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S20 FE has a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE takes just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lesser megapixels back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
Although Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S20 FE, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.