Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, getting a global score of 90.8 against 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE design is newer, but just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than the Google Pixel 3 XL. Google Pixel 3 XL has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 31 percent more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a worse video quality and a less mega pixels back facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos.
Although Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. If you want to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.