Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Google Pixel 6a, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 76.4. Galaxy S20 FE's construction is a little bit thinner than Google Pixel 6a, although it is a bit heavier and was released around 22 months before. These devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version.
Galaxy S20 FE features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a bit worse screen pixels density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a lot better hardware performance than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a lower resolution camera, a tinier aperture and a lower video quality.
Google Pixel 6a's battery duration is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy S20 FE, although the Google Pixel 6a has just 4410mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy S20 FE is a bit more expensive than Google Pixel 6a, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.