Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-02 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.70 ounces | -- |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is much better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), having a overall score of 90.8 against 82.2. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a sharper screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels number per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a much more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a way lower resolution back camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality.
The Galaxy S20 FE features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.