Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-02 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is much better than HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. Even though the Galaxy S20 FE is newer than HTC U Ultra, it's somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. The Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixels quantity per display inch. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better memory to install applications and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a slightly better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
Galaxy S20 FE features a way better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.