Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE construction is newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than the LG G7 Fit.
Galaxy S20 FE has a bit faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and faster). LG G7 Fit has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower video definition and a back-facing camera with a lot lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.