Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-02 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 509.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the LG K62, getting a 90.8 score against 78.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has newer 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10, giving a couple additional features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy S20 FE is a a little bit heavier phone than the LG K62, but both of them are equally thin.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit better hardware performance than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM. Galaxy S20 FE has a sharper screen than LG K62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a much better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG K62 counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG K62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit longer battery performance than LG K62, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with just a bit better camera than LG K62, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.