Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-02 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 509.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 general score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy S20 FE is a incredibly newer phone than LG V30S ThinQ, but it's heavier and somewhat thicker.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher screen density. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit more powerful processor than LG V30S ThinQ. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution, a lot less megapixels back facing camera and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos.
Galaxy S20 FE features greater battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.